Search for: "United States v. Freed" Results 121 - 140 of 405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2023, 1:12 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
The justices have agreed to decide the following issue: “Whether district courts, in determining whether the due process clause requires a state or local government to provide a post-seizure probable-cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial-forfeiture proceeding and, if so, when such a hearing must take place, should apply the “speedy trial” test employed in United States v. $8,850 and Barker v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:20 am
However, in two published opinions in 2002 in the federal death penalty case of United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:57 am by Karen Hoffmann
They fled gender-based violence and threats to their lives in their home countries and sought asylum in the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 8:37 am by Eric Goldman
The court concludes: Whether it is wise for members of the United States Congress to block critical constituents from their social-media accounts is not for a court to say. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 11:41 am by Will Baude
United States, and Richard Re, who wrote an excellent amicus brief and underlying article, has some typically interesting thoughts over at Prawfsblawg. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
The sequel case is American Tradition Partnership, et al., v. [read post]
16 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  It was simply a fact of life in the United States, one that Americans take for granted. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:00 am
District Court for the Central District of California, as well as the United States Court of Appeals, both refused to dismiss the case. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 1:00 am by Maleha Khan Justis
Before Lord Neuberger, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson, judgment was handed down in the case of the Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water Plc, [2014] UKSC 40 on 2nd July 2014. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 2:37 pm
The 13th Amendment speaks of places (United States) and institutions (slavery), not persons and rights. [read post]