Search for: "United States v. GULF DEVELOPMENT COMPANY"
Results 1 - 20
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2013, 6:42 am
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 2:30 pm
This Court recently relied on UP’s brief in Association of California Insurance Companies v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 8:15 am
("CT v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 8:46 am
Salazar illustrates the care needed in seeking and enforcing an injunction against an agency of the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 1:48 pm
United States, 996 F.2d 1121, 1126 (11th Cir. 1993). [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
The companies came to an agreement for use of the rig and Maersk USA and Statoil Gulf of Mexico LLC (Statoil), a Texas Corporation, signed a contract in Norway. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
[T]he National Development and Reform Commission. . . guides macroeconomic planning and intervenes in markets, particularly by setting prices for many products and by influencing national oil companies and other state-owned enterprises [SOEs]. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:40 am
United States, and a companion case, Sandlin v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These U.S. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:30 am
See Person v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:28 pm
Few books can get you from the rainy coast of Newfoundland over 19th-century Holstein straight to sunny Queensland and back to the North of Pennsylvania, while telling stories of a retired MI5 agent, the largest Ponzi scheme in history, a company founded by the 41st President of the United States, the aftermath of the First Gulf War, and the collapse of the Federal Bank of Australia. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
States develop TMDLs and. . . [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Okla. 1984). 6 See United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 7:51 pm
As in the United States, corporations in Saudi Arabia are treated as fictional persons with specific legal obligations. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
" EDF Release: Supreme Court Win for Cross-State Air Pollution Rule<> Shell Oil Company v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am
Petitioners, a contingent of environmental and community groups, bring serious challenges to the State of California's plans to improve air quality in the San Joaquin Valley, an area with some of the worst air quality in the United States -- i.e. [read post]
