Search for: "United States v. Garza"
Results 21 - 40
of 172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2020, 2:16 pm
BUT, the two units they’re closing (Jester 1 and Garza East) were both pretty well staffed. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:15 pm
On January 3, 2020, Axon Enterprises Inc. filed a complaint against the Federal Trade Commission in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona challenging the constitutionality of the FTC’s administrative process. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 9:08 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:19 am
Evan Lee has this blog’s analysis of Wednesday’s opinion in the other case, Garza v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
Both the state of Idaho and the United States, as amicus curiae, had argued that the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel analysis should be different when the defendant has waived appeal. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am
” In Garza v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:08 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 8:43 am
Indiana, Cause No. 17-1091 before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 5:26 am
The outcome in Garza v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 3:27 am
United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:41 am
Following Tuesday morning’s argument in Garza v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
Garza v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 6:29 pm
” Garza v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 1:45 pm
Last September, a 17-year-old woman known as Jane Doe arrived in the United States and discovered she was pregnant. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm
United States, and then, in two consolidated cases, Stitt and Sims v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:09 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Michelle Goldberg maintains that Kavanaugh’s opinion in Garza v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:56 am
” Garza v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:58 am
Kavanaugh has only written a decision in one case regarding abortion — Garza v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:02 pm
Homero Joshua Garza, GAW Miners, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-01760 (D. [read post]
