Search for: "United States v. Gay"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2020, 6:27 am
” Prior to Bostock, it was legal in more than half of the states of our country to fire or not hire workers for being gay, bisexual, or transgender. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:31 pm
More importantly, the Defense of Marriage Act decision struck down a key component of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:32 pm
With respect to gay rights specifically, many of the states of the United States have statutes, constitutional provisions, and court decisions that deny individuals the right to have a family, specifically a spouse and children, based on sexual orientation. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 3:23 pm
Kaplan, Roberta Kaplan, SCOTUS, Stop and Frisk, Supreme Court, United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:37 pm
” Amestoy was the author of Baker v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit concluded that “sexual orientation discrimination is motivated, at least in part, by sex and is thus a subset of sex discrimination. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:46 am
From the New Yorker: Today, the official archive of gay marriage is still in its infancy: in the United States, June marked the fifth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 3:00 am
"Since the Constitution of the United States says nothing about this subject, it is left to be resolved by normal democratic means, including the democratic adoption of provisions in state constitutions," Scalia said. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:11 am
The attorneys and staff at Wessel, Lehker, & Fumelle add our voices to the joyful choir welcoming the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:30 am
Now the law throughout the United States, California has recognized gay marriage since 2008 (though only by those married during the window before Proposition 8 was passed) and then again in 2013 when the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Perry v Hollingsworth overturning the Proposition 8 prohibition. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
The cases involved a man and a woman who had been dismissed by the Royal Air Force and 2 men who had been dismissed by the Royal Navy for being homosexual (see, respectively, Smith And Grady v United Kingdom and Lustig-Prean and Beckett v UK; also, the 2002 case of Beck, Copp and Bazeley v UK). [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am
The view of liberty at the heart of the Court’s gay rights cases – Romer, Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:45 pm
'” On June 26, 2013, a divided Court in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:57 pm
See Vicuna v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:40 pm
Wrote Whatley, "In interpreting the Full Faith and Credit Clause, the United States Supreme Court has held that '[a] final judgment in one State, if rendered by a court with adjudicatory authority over the subject matter and persons governed by the judgment, qualifies for recognition throughout the land," citing Baker v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:28 pm
In reaching that result, the panel applied a “heightened scrutiny” analysis, saying that was now necessary after the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm
Congress over the past few decades to make it more and more difficult for an individual to be granted refugee status in the United States. [read post]
31 May 2012, 1:21 pm
This is the heart and soul of the decision: That premise is inconsistent with the reasoning underlying the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Lawrence v Texas (539 US 558 [2003]), in which the Court held that laws criminalizing homosexual conduct violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution (id. at 578). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:11 am
The attorneys and staff at Wessel, Lehker, & Fumelle add our voices to the joyful choir welcoming the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:11 am
The attorneys and staff at Wessel, Lehker, & Fumelle add our voices to the joyful choir welcoming the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
