Search for: "United States v. General Dynamics" Results 181 - 200 of 1,029
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
            This “Introduction to the Law and Legal Systems of the United States” course is meant to provide a general foundation for your law studies and graduate studies that touch on a critically important and influential law and legal system. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:22 pm
Because a copyright infringement claim would not provide the banks with complete relief, which was to put Fly out of business, the banks also included in their Federal case a claim under the State common law tort of "hot-news" misappropriation, otherwise stated as reaping the benefits of what one has not sown (in the words of an earlier United States Supreme Court Decision). [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:27 pm by Sean Wajert
M/V Ya Mawlaya, 99 F.3d 717, 722 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:18 am by Andrew Wainer
  As in the United States and other countries suffering increasing inequality and declining faith in institutions, poor governance in the Northern Triangle is generating a lack of support for democracy itself. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:36 am by Florian Mueller
Yesterday a public redacted version of an Ericsson filing with the ITC became available, and it states that "[t]he vast majority of the Accused [Ericsson] Products are manufactured and assembled in the United States from [REDACTED] of individually imported components. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:55 am
And because “[l]evel of generality is destiny” in law, see Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 12:08 pm
United States, 483 U.S. 350 (1987). [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:33 am by Isaac
The United States Supreme Court (USSC) is today hearing oral arguments in Alice Corp v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am by Beth Van Schaack
  The Northern District of CA dismissed the class action suit in September 2014 on the theory that the case did not have sufficient ties to the United States to overcome the presumption against extraterritoriality under the test set forth by the Supreme Court in Kiobel v. [read post]