Search for: "United States v. General Dynamics"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
” In United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:42 pm
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U.S. 481 (1968), the United States Supreme Court held that federal antitrust defendants generally may not assert a pass-on defense, because even a direct purchaser who passes on an overcharge, will likely be damaged in other ways by defendants’ violation of antitrust law. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
These state owned enterprises (SOEs) operate where state duty and enterprise responsibility meet. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Last year, he argued before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Davis v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:48 am
Court of Appeals in Thaler v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:09 am
Sept. 8, 2005); In re Dynamic Random Access Memory Antitrust Litig., 2006 U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:28 am
The two cases below are consolidated and the cert. grant is limited to question 1 in 09-1298 and to question 2 in 09-1302: Title: General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:11 am
United States and General Dynamics v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:28 am
Rumsfeld, Hamdan v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:05 am
Waxman, a former United States solicitor general, was caught in the cross-fire. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 9:40 am
Generally, demand for student housing is also increasing post pandemic, which is relevant for downtown Cleveland due to the presence of Cleveland State University and – to a lesser extent – Cuyahoga Community College. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views… [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:18 pm
The complaint alleges that Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) unlawfully imports into the United States, sells for importation, and sells within the United States after importation certain digital imaging devices and related software that infringe certain claims of U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views… [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Walking out of the Constitutional Convention on its final day, back in 1789, Benjamin Franklin was (supposedly) asked what kind of government he had helped create for the new entity to be known as the “United States of America. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
In System Dynamics International, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IP Think Tank) WIPO working group to reconsider rules on appellations of origin (Intellectual Property Watch) Economic downturn hits trade mark filings (Managing Intellectual Property) Global - Patents Dynamic tools for innovation management (Securing Innovation) Dynamic tools for invention review (Securing Innovation) Dynamic tools for publication clearance (Securing Innovation) Dynamic tools for trade secrets (Securing Innovation) Eureka! [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:52 pm
In today's South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
