Search for: "United States v. General Petroleum Corporation"
Results 61 - 80
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 7:53 am
And contrary to some commentators, the 1790 criminal piracy statute at issue in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm
Several of the commentators have repeatedly stated that the ATS extended universal jurisdiction (and corporate liability) to piracy. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
In Kiobel, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissing a complaint filed under the ATS. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:15 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:09 am
But in that case the only place they could sue was in the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 10:12 am
Alvarez-Machain, which involved the extraterritorial actions of a non-citizen agent of the U.S. government – again, that is well within the purposes of the ATS and entirely distinct from corporations with only tenuous connections to the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum – an Alien Tort Statute case involving a violation of the law of nations and whether a corporation can be a defendant in an Alien Tort Statute action; United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:15 pm
As previously reported here, the United States Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in the case of Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:41 am
V. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:58 am
The following contribution to our Kiobel v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These U.S. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:35 am
As was recently reported on this blog, in September the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit entered an important decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:06 am
More generally, Kiobel has become shorthand for the notion of corporate accountability. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:20 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
Instead, Chief Justice Roberts emphasized that “United States Law…does not rule the world,” a phrase he first used in his opinion for the Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 4:39 am
“Pleading general corporate activity is no better,” he wrote. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. (2013), another corporate complicity case involving the extractive industries in Nigeria. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
The views expressed in these posts are those of the authors, and not of the Attorney-General's department or the Australian Government] The decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum is remarkable for a number a reasons. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
” The case is United Student Aid Fund v. [read post]
