Search for: "United States v. Ghailani" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2013, 8:12 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Now available in redacted form: the government’s opposition brief and the defendant’s reply in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 10:45 am by rtruman
Terror Suspect Loses Bid to Dismiss Charges Over Alleged Torture :: United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:24 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Anthony O'Rourke (State University of New York (SUNY), Buffalo, SUNY Buffalo Law School) has posted Extrajudicial Detentions and the Speedy Trial Right: Reflections on United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 1:47 pm by Christine Dowling
Disparity in Federal Sentencing:  Boston Globe staff writer Jonathan Saltzman has this article on a recent study of the widened disparity in federal sentences in light of the case United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:54 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Steve Vladeck outlined his critiques of Justice Kennedy’s analysis of Bivens damages, as set forth in the majority opinion in Ziglar v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:15 am by Adam Wagner
The men challenged the ruling of the Court of Appeal that evidence obtained in United States detention camps could be used in proceedings against them. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:18 am by David G. Badertscher
District Court, Southern DistrictCriminal Practice Judge Rules Key Government Witness Cannot Testify in Embassy Bombing Case United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:01 am by Andrew Breidenbach
On Friday, the Senate approved a bill – crafted in response to the Court’s decision last Term in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:19 am by Mary B. McCord
  And he deplored as “wrong-headed” the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 7:40 am by Transplanted Lawyer
Having a federal prison located on a naval base outside the de jure territorial limits of the United States is not something that ought to give anyone much heartburn from a Constitutional law perspective. [read post]
21 May 2009, 5:09 pm
  The United States is a nation of laws and so we must abide by these rulings. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:36 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
  Moreover, such a precedent could logically allow future terrorist groups to announce they were at war with the United States and lawfully kill our service personnel if they just adopted means conforming to the law of armed conflict. [read post]