Search for: "United States v. Golden"
Results 161 - 180
of 770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2012, 8:36 am
United States v. 300 Units of Rentable Housing, Case No. 09-35990 (9th Cir. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:16 pm
At issue is whether the STB and the second respondent, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), complied with their obligations under § 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to ensure that the proposed rail was "not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species" before approving the exemption. 16 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 9:50 am
The DOJ and the Golden State will indeed speak. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am
The controversy over the Second Bank of the United States, ostensibly settled in McCullough v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 6:25 pm
Second, Plaintiffs allege that Cisco’s developmental actions relevant to the Golden Shield took place predominantly, if not entirely, within the United States. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:31 am
JOSEFFER (ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING THE PETITIONER): The United States view — I’m not sure exactly how much we disagree on this — but the United States view is that, for example, a blank disk is not a component of this invention because you don’t need a blank disk to practice this invention. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 9:15 am
2022cv1564-24 [9] Feist Publications, Inc., v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
In a 2011 decision, Sullivan v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm
Ryan Reft, Library of Congress, has posted Gideon v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Brown v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:10 pm
United States, (Docket No. 08-6651). [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:39 am
Relying on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Egelhoff v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:24 pm
Et nous venons d’apprendre que la demande de marque a été rejetée par le USPTO (i.e., United States Patent and Trademark Office). [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 10:16 pm
216 Jamaica Avenue, LLC v. [read post]
