Search for: "United States v. Goldsmith" Results 101 - 120 of 443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a commercial fisherman violated the anti-shredding provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act when he destroyed several undersized fish. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 5:15 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Scott Anderson flagged his Lawfare@FP piece on the ambiguity in Trump’s announcement that that United States will recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 1:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A second memo discusses this position on Stellar Wind in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Hamdi v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm by William Appleton
United States of America, which vacated a U.S. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
In his Proclamation 5517 (1986), he justified this exclusion on the ground that he “found that the unrestricted entry into the United States as immigrants by Cuban citizens would . . . be detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:06 am by Katherine Pompilio
Jack Goldsmith and Oona Hathaway explained how the limited and informal system in place at the time of Snepp v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:53 am by Jordan Brunner
Lisa Monaco presented the dangers of turning inward in response to transregional threats faced by United States faces. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 3:39 pm
Goldsmith and once in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 10:36 am by Timothy Edgar
  The closest analogy for Mueller’s decision to charge the Russian trolls is probably the May 2014 indictment in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:26 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, in which Donald Trump has been trying to argue that he is immune from prosecution for acts taken while he was President (as Eugene noted here). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 6:19 pm by Wells Bennett
And that’s as good a reminder as any that, tomorrow, Lawfare will resume coverage of pretrial motions hearings in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 12:00 pm by David Oscar Markus
United States, where Justice Jackson was the only member of the Court to join Justice Gorsuch’s majority opinion in full; and Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have this article out in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
29 May 2023, 7:15 am by Karina Lytvynska
As of May 17, 2023 the case was still pending.[2] Roberts and Edwards were both raised in the southern United States and their artwork explores Black identity through collage. [read post]
It is Congress, not the president, that has the power to “provide for the ... general welfare,” “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states,” to appropriate money, and “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution” all “powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States. [read post]