Search for: "United States v. Goodwill" Results 201 - 220 of 484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am by Alessandro Cerri
The only exception to the exclusive licence was said to be “Ford’s existing non-exclusive licence in the United Kingdom”.CSL argued that the express carve-out for the United Kingdom could only make sense if the 1997 licence was being granted worldwide, and that the reference to “federal” marks was simply loose language. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v Shaun Coley (trading as BMW Mini Gearbox Centre) is an extempore ruling of Judge Hacon in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, late last month, which this Kat spotted as a note on the Lawtel subscription-only service. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Gameologist Group, LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:53 am
In addition, Fluke asserts that the evidence shows that the respondents have a large manufacturing capacity and maintain large inventories of DMMs in the United States. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
The Maine Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:56 am
United Cerebral Palsy has compiled a comprehensive Resource Guide for individuals with cerebral palsy in Colorado. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 11:42 am by Robert George
For example, this past summer when the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in the Dobbs case, reversing Roe v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
HD is the registered owner of the SCREAMIN’ EAGLE trademark for clothing in the United States and other countries but does not have such a registration in Canada. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
Would this be an appropriate case for a defence of parody or, in the United States, fair use (and could the facts be forced to fit within the scope of "fair dealing" or any other defences under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988)? [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:53 pm by Ron Coleman
 In short, the Fourth Circuit’s Balmora decision holds that in passing Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, Congress intended to protect Mexican citizens from coming to the United States and buying merchandise bearing ersatz Mexican trademarks that have never been used in commerce in the United States before they return to Mexico, because these visitors, Congress concluded, bring their goodwill with them. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 9:54 pm by Boris
("OCC"), the sole clearing agency for standardized securities options in the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
§§ 1481 and 1484, which require true and accurate information on invoices and entry documents.Government lawyers allege in United States v. [read post]