Search for: "United States v. Goodyear" Results 61 - 80 of 242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2011, 8:00 am by Amanda Rice
United States, the Armed Career Criminal Act case. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:15 am by tom
UNITED STATES 09-1272    KENTUCKY v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 5:22 pm
Perhaps the most important suit to-date has been the United States Supreme Court's May 2007 ruling in Ledbetter v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 5:00 pm
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 11:41 am
Assistant to the Solicitor General Irving Gornstein argued on behalf of the United States as an amicus curiae in support of respondent. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:10 am by Nabiha Syed
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
They want access to our markets without being held responsible for the damage they are causing to consumers here in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 7:26 am by Dennis Crouch
United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 2:41 pm by John Bellinger
  The brief argues that “The uncertain threat of litigation in United States courts, especially for conduct with no significant connection to the United States, could therefore discourage foreign commercial enterprises from establishing channels for their distribution of goods and services in the United States, or otherwise making investments in the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm by Bexis
We gave you our quickie analysis of Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:15 am by Max Kennerly
The United States Supreme Court, the least productive court in the nation, is back on summer recess until October. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:49 am by Erin Napoleon
In United States Patent and Trademark Office v Booking.com BV, the court upheld a Fourth Circuit decision stating that simply adding a top-level domain to a generic term does not render the mark generic in its entirety. [read post]