Search for: "United States v. Graves"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,590
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2012, 8:01 am
The children were born in the County of Poole, United Kingdom, and are citizens of the United Kingdom and the United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:56 am
United States, Death v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:03 am
In Ortiz v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:51 am
s return to the United States. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:07 pm
Eidem v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:17 am
As the district court found, Ermini and Vittori leased a house in the United States and put their house in Italy on the market; enrolled the children in school and extracurricular activities in the United States; planned to open a business in the United States; prepared to move all of their belongings to the United States; and shifted Daniele's all-important medical care and treatment to the United States.… [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
In the United States, S.C. was evaluated by Dr. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:40 pm
In Mlynarski v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 12:07 pm
Cunningham acquiesced to the child’s residence in the United States, that the child would be subject to a grave risk of harm if it were to return to Japan, or that the child was well-settled in the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
Since Luciana wrongfully retained the children in the United States and no grave risk of harm was presented to the children by returning them to Brazil, the Court granted Andre’s petition. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:16 am
Petitioner did not consent or acquiesce to the Child’s retention in the United States. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:58 am
Monasky v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 10:58 am
” Habrzyk v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 8:03 am
[Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20] In Rodriguez v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
Saada were in the United States, Ms. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:44 am
In Carvajal v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm
To the Senate of the United States: With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the Senate to ratification, I transmit herewith the Treaty on Extradition between the United States of America and Italy, signed at Rome on October 13, 1983. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 10:03 am
May 7, 2008) (holding that the parties’ custody agreement that stated that after returning to Colombia the child could move to the United States if he so desired was insufficient to establish the petitioner consented to retention of the child in the United States). [read post]
