Search for: "United States v. Griffith" Results 181 - 200 of 297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2011, 2:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
McDONOUGH and DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP, Defendants.10 Civ. 6106 (DAB)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2011 U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Evan Lee previews United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:12 pm
The Munaf decision, Judge Ginsburg wrote, established that courts may not judge a planned transfer of a detainee to another country in the face of “the policy of the United States not to transfer a detainee to a country where he is likely to be tortured. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
United States, 13-10639 (third relist), asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – categorically prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with the retroactivity rule set out in Griffith v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 10:47 pm by JD Hull
Erwin Griswold, Law and Lawyers in the United States, 65 (Cambridge, Harv. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 11:18 am by lsammis
Consider the ruling in a 1985 UK case, Lion Laboratories v Evans, [1984] 2 All ER 417, [1985] QB 526. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Nor are developing countries likely to model their legal system on countries with first amendment protection, such as the United States, if the verdicts are 15 times higher than in the United Kingdom[6]. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 10:27 am by Michael Livermore
United States, in which a separate opinion by Kennedy avoided a majority opinion by Scalia that would have severely limited the scope of federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
” This is despite China’s National Intelligence Law which requires citizens to cooperate and assist with state intelligence work. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-0639, asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule conflicts with the retroactivity rule established in Griffith v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:51 pm by Peter Margulies
The best indication of the joint dissent’s misunderstanding of the Framers’ scheme is its treatment of Justice Story’s landmark 1820 opinion in a piracy case, United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ben
As this exception has only recently been introduced in the United Kingdom - the CopyKat is doubly excited! [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 3:14 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  For instance, he might set a criminal free for a reason which has nothing to do with the reliability of the evidence or the justice of the case.Orin Kerr at VC has this post on United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
United States The Justice Department’s Civil Division told a federal appellate court that it will continue to try and defend former President Donald Trump in a libel suit brought by E. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Commentary magazine has published the responses they received from a wide variety of writers and broadcasters to the question ‘is free speech under threat in the United States? [read post]