Search for: "United States v. Gris"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2017, 12:07 pm
In both cases, United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 12:07 pm
In both cases, United States v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:52 pm
United States, Docket 2018-1206) [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 12:26 pm
United States, 838 F.3d 1272, 1276 (Fed. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 2:30 pm
” United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:47 pm
United States, 723 F.3d 1353, 1358 (Fed. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 12:23 pm
United States, 254 F. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 7:43 am
United States. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 6:44 pm
I am surprised to learn that I did not cover the Court of International Trade's classification decision in Alcan Food Packaging v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 2:45 pm
United States, 607 F.3d 771, 773 (Fed. [read post]
19 May 2022, 3:54 pm
United States, 423 F.3d 1326, 1333 (Fed. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:14 pm
One notebook computer entered the United States (via an FTZ) with two batteries. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:02 pm
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 7:03 am
United States, a recent Court of International Trade decision answering the burning question: Is a seat that you strap to a bicycle a seat or is it a bike accessory? [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 10:32 am
United States, newly minted U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 8:57 am
Because the tariff headings in question describe only part of the products, the Court moved on the GRI 3, which states:3. [read post]
25 May 2021, 3:32 pm
United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 9:21 am
United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 5:26 pm
The Federal Circuit took the CIT to task for moving beyond GRI 1 and applying the rule of relative specify under GRI 3. [read post]
