Search for: "United States v. Hair"
Results 81 - 100
of 755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Br. at 36 (rejecting "Trump's linguistic hair-splitting between 'officer of' and 'office under' the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:10 pm
None of them bother to mention United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Dressed in brown leather aviator jacket, gold chain, hair down to shoulders United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:22 am
Not that it was some long-haired hippie throw-back to the Warren Court, but that there was a long tradition of the top court refusing to trot in lock-step with the United States Supreme Court when it came to finding novel excuses to ignore the Bill of Rights, or the local flavor, Article I, § 12 of the New York Constitution. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:55 am
It also provides representative examples of the mark as displayed on products in stores in the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
PRACTICE NOTE: Foreign copyright holders with substantial business in the United States should obtain U.S. copyright registrations to avail themselves of all remedies under the Copyright Act. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 2:15 pm
Unilever United States Inc., et al., Case No. 1:12-cv-06058, in the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:41 am
International Hair Cosmetics Group Pty Ltd v International Hair Cosmetics Limited [2011] FCA 339 [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm
Ambien is the most widely prescribed sleep aid in the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
The media frenzy so tainted the case that the United States Supreme Court released him and ordered a 1966 retrial in the case Sheppard v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
Some have even heard tell of one mythical judgment in which the paragraph count struggled majestically but was finally laid to rest within a hair’s breadth of single digits. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:09 pm
Playing catch-up: Laws protecting cultural property in the United States need an update. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
Baez, who was a citizen of the United States, was gainfully employed. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:31 am
United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Rosenberg v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
Wallace, United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am
Plaintiff was also granted leave to file an amended complaint setting out a RLUIPA claim.In United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Yet if that explains (albeit without justifying) the majority’s rejection of the due process and equal protection claims, a threshold requirement of support in constitutional text cannot explain the bottom line in Jones, because the plaintiffs also relied on an express constitutional text.They invoked the Twenty-Fourth Amendment, which provides: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote” in any federal election “shall not be denied or abridged by… [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
Fiddler v. [read post]
