Search for: "United States v. Hammer"
Results 201 - 220
of 388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2014, 2:34 pm
Today the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied a petition for leave to file an interlocutory appeal in the matter of Patrick v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
This past summer I had the amazing opportunity to intern with the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (thank you, Professor Hammer, for organizing such a rewarding internship program). [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:53 am
In Matter of R.B v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:42 am
United States (E.D. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 1:47 pm
The case is Huskey v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
On July 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Maryland – Hershey v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:55 am
United States (No. 13-127) Walker v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
18 May 2014, 10:15 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:10 am
The respondents have now filed their merits briefs in the two much-anticipated cell phone search cases that the Supreme Court will hear on April 29, United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:43 am
United Air Lines, Inc., (D.N.J. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
The origin of this doctrine was hammered out in a 1908 United States Supreme Court case, Winters v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:25 am
And so the government came down so hard on her that even the 7th Circuit dissenter in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:38 am
Two cases whose names may well be connected to one of the most important rulings the Supreme Court will make in our lifetime are United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 3:50 am
In New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
In Ross v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
Moreover, in Weber v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
Would this be an appropriate case for a defence of parody or, in the United States, fair use (and could the facts be forced to fit within the scope of "fair dealing" or any other defences under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988)? [read post]
