Search for: "United States v. Handy" Results 161 - 180 of 200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2009, 1:43 pm by Luke Gilman
It translates: The Supreme Court of the United States today decided that the power of the President of the United States does not extend to the Philippines, on the ground that all past Congressional legislation on the subject is unconstitutional. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:24 am
Justice Jackson made this point in a barb at Justice Frankfurter in West Virginia State Bd of Educ. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
(Federal public defenders apparently already are paid on par with Assistant United States Attorneys.) [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:04 am
  In light of the Supreme Court's rulings in Gall and Kimbrough, which had come down in the interim, the majority held in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 7:18 am by Nancy Prager
Especially since like most contracts, there is a strong likelihood that if you end up litigating a Creative Commons brand license in the United States it will be enforced. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
Reassuringly it affirms that Creative Commons is not an anti-copyright device but a provider of handy guidance to would-be users, and it doesn't threaten readers with Moorhouse v University of New South Wales, choosing to explain the legal position instead. [read post]