Search for: "United States v. Harkins" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2011, 7:45 am by hjmarcus
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:58 am by Andrew Frisch
 The current regulation has previously been upheld by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Long Island Care at Home, LTD. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
  The United States District Court for the District of Arizona granted CCRRG’s motion to compel arbitration and dismissed the action. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 10:19 am by Susan Brenner
United States makes clear, the fact that non-privileged information was communicated to an attorney may be privileged, even if the underlying information remains unprotected. 449 U.S. 383 (1981). [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:35 am
If you teach in the United States, you have that obligation! [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
United States, 156 U.S. 432, 453 (1895). [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
We agree with the reasoning set forth in the Keller and Harkins decisions; however, the Appellate Division, Second Department confronted with facts very similar to ours stated otherwise. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:36 am by Adam Wagner
This is the first time the court has ruled that Article 6 should prevent a deportation – see our summary post HARKINS AND EDWARDS v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:05 am by Stephen Wermiel
United States (2012),  to decisions about the safety of medical devices, Riegel v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
This is the Iowa cerebral palsy resource guide; this guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R v McCool (Northern Ireland); R v Harkin (Northern Ireland), heard 23 Nov 2017. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 7:10 am by Christopher G. Hill
Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am by Marie Louise
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (Patents Post-Grant) District Court C D California: TP tops Despatch as court rules up is not down: Despatch Industries v TP Solar (Green Patent Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Late Allergan Reduction – “The allergans” requires all allergans not just one or more: Late Allergen Reduction v Dynarex (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Mondis – Public statements by foreign… [read post]