Search for: "United States v. Hazelton"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
Today, the United States Supreme Court rendered an Order in Hazelton, PA v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:01 am
He immigrated to the United States in 1884. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:55 am
Supreme Court makes it clear that absent "exceptional circumstances," the Thirteenth Amendment bars compulsory labor “enforced by the use or threatened use of physical or legal coercion," citing United States v Kozminski 487 US 931 and a number of other cases. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:29 am
United States, the Court held that a federal sentencing court must determine whether “an offense under State law” is a “serious drug offense” by consulting the “maximum term of imprisonment” applicable to a defendant’s prior state drug offense at the time of the defendant’s conviction for that offense. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
The United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,13 all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,13 all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,[13] all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,[13] all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,[13] all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,[13] all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
After an unsuccessful direct appeal, United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Hazelton and Rachael K. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Conspirators in various locations throughout the United States (identity brokers) solicited customers. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Conspirators in various locations throughout the United States (identity brokers) solicited customers. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
The Pennsylvania cerebral palsy resource guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
