Search for: "United States v. Herrera" Results 41 - 60 of 147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2019, 6:59 am by Melanie Fontes
By Jeremy Pilaar* Earlier this month, Uber and Lyft drivers across the United States and the world went on strike. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of Herrera v Wyoming An 1868 treaty between the United States and the Crow Tribe promised that in exchange for most of the Tribe’s territory in modern-day Montana and Wyoming, its members would “have the right to hunt on the unoccupied lands of the United States so long as game may be found thereon . . . and peace subsists . . . on the borders of the hunting districts. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
At the NCSL blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Monday’s opinion in Herrera v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 12:39 pm by Adam Feldman
United States along with Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ginsburg and Elena Kagan, while Justice Stephen Breyer was in the court’s majority. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 10:08 am by Guest Blogger
 And indeed, both Herrera and the United States (as amicus) have urged the Court to do just that: put Race Horse out to pasture once and for all.The Court is now left with three options (assuming that no ancillary issues derail a merits determination). [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps suggests that Herrera v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:18 am by Gregory Ablavsky
In this case, the validity of Herrera’s state-law conviction turns on the continued force of the 1868 Second Treaty of Fort Laramie between the Crow Tribe and the United States, which guaranteed the tribe “the right to hunt on the unoccupied lands of the United States so long as game may be found thereon. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm by Amy Howe
Wyoming (Jan. 8): Validity of 1868 treaty giving Crow Tribe of Indians the right to hunt on the “unoccupied lands of the United States” Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm by Rory Little
United States, and then, in two consolidated cases, Stitt and Sims v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
Albrecht, 17-290 (pre-emption), Herrera v. [read post]