Search for: "United States v. Hoag" Results 21 - 32 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Dukes: Class Action Impact & Analysis ...- SCOTUS Has Been Busy    A handful of other notable decisions from the United States Supreme Court - trending on JD Supra:Recent Supreme Court Decision May Affect Federally Funded Research (McNees)United States Supreme Court Strikes Down Vermont Pharmaceutical "Data Mining" Law (Foley Hoag)Supreme Court Strikes Two Blows Against Patient Safety (Patrick Malone &… [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Supreme Court's recent decision in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:13 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Hackensack, NJ lawyer Jay McDaniel on his New Jersey Business Dissolution Journal Key Trends in eDiscovery for 2011 - David Kaufer of TERIS on the firm's Sophisticated Litigation Support Blog Another Twombly/Iqbal Victory for Plaintiffs: SCOTUS Denies Certiorari for Digital Music Price-Fixing Case - Philadelphia attorney Maxwell Kennerly of The Beasley Firm at his blog, Litigation & Trial Loss Causation - Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v… [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 2:34 am
Taking of a blood sample and creation of a DNA profile found not to be an unreasonable search Foley Hoag LLP"In a recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, Martin Boroiang v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Supreme Court decisions will likely impact companies' drafting of arbitration provisionsDiaz ReusTwo recent United States Supreme Court decisions present significant new developments on the scope and interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:37 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Pileggi of Fox Rothschild in his Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog Krupski v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:42 pm
- Hartford lawyer Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Holding the Government to Its Promises: United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:50 pm
Because Microsoft does not export from the United States the copies of Windows installed on the foreign-made computers in question, Microsoft does not “suppl[y] . . . from the United States” “components” of those computers, and therefore is not liable under §271(f)as currently written. [read post]