Search for: "United States v. Hole" Results 1 - 20 of 813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2023, 5:00 am by Paul Caron
United States, a case that opens up the possibility that large swaths of the tax code, particularly... [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:39 am by Kevin
The example in the headline, United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:21 am by Ashley Deeks
Assange’s purported reason for holing up in the Ecuadorean embassy is that he fears being extradited from Sweden to United States, where he is worried about being subjected to the death penalty. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 10:40 pm by KLIBlogsAdmin
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-2215, 25 July 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:30 am
Petitioners-Appellants Greater Yellowstone Coalition, Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance, and Wyoming Outdoor Council (collectively GYC) sent a letter to the United States Forest Service (Forest Service") and the United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) requesting the agencies to undertake environmental analyses of Wyoming elk feedgrounds located on Federal land. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:45 am by Peter Reap
Institut Straumann AG, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, Nos. 17-1341, 19 June 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm by Brenda Fulmer
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 7:45 am
United States, in which, after an eight-year campaign originating in Justice Scalia dissents, a majority declared the 'residual clause' of a federal repeat-offender statute unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Under this line of reasoning, anyone selling foreign securities in the United States and closing the transaction in the United States could escape application of the antifraud provisions. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Section 112, first paragraph, of Title 35 of the United States Code sets forth the disclosure requirements that all patentees must meet. [read post]