Search for: "United States v. Hole"
Results 61 - 80
of 813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2007, 11:13 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 12:39 pm
United States, a pending case argued last month about the meaning of the 2018 First Step Act in which a lot of fundamental questions of statutory interpretation were in play. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm
The Federal Circuit analogized the phrase at issue with the phrase “I am going to create an electric car for the United States and United Kingdom. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:07 am
United States Dept. of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir.1982), where the Court had held that judicial approval is necessary of settlements in FLSA lawsuits. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 5:48 pm
United States, 179 F.3d 29, 35 (2nd Cir 1999). [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 5:09 am
In December, the Sixth Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:29 pm
"In rejecting Smallwood’s Fourth Amendment challenge, the district court relied upon United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:09 am
But Judges Tjoflat, Pryor, and Fay issued United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:42 pm
Khalik v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 8:17 am
Supreme Court case (United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 5:47 am
" A hole-in-one for InterDigital. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 5:00 am
Of course, the state appealed, and the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
Briefly: In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses last week’s grant in the two cell phone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 10:00 am
., v. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 12:08 pm
Supreme court granted Microsoft's petition for a writ of certiorari in Microsoft Corp. v AT & T Corp., No. 05-1056, proceedings below, AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 5:29 am
S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
Two years to the day after the Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
See Wenger v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
Section 112, first paragraph, of Title 35 of the United States Code sets forth the disclosure requirements that all patentees must meet. [read post]
