Search for: "United States v. Holland" Results 361 - 380 of 449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(RelatIP)   United Kingdom Tweaks to the UK patent system (IPKat) UK IPO announces 100th Patent Office Opinion issued since s74A – or is it 98? [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:47 pm
You asked all those years why the United States couldn’t be more like Sweden. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am by INFORRM
John Bryan, who once dated Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, has launched a legal action against News Corporation in the United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
The United States ratified the Hague Convention in 1988, and the Convention was implemented by the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create… [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
United States, 64 F.3d 206 (5th Cir. 1995); Barnes v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 6:06 am by Clara Apt
Climate Change and the Courts Greenhouse Gaslighting: Deceptive Moderation and West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:36 am by SHG
“It was very interesting today, hearing your argument in Holland v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm by Bexis
  At least one ethical opinion that we've found also rejects Hall's no-coaching rationale for prohibiting in-deposition conferences.On the other hand, in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  (This is also likely to be the case under the fledgling tort of intrusion into seclusion established in C v Holland [2012] NZHC 2155.) [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am by Marie Louise
(PatLit) UK Supreme Court – The final battle in Star Wars copyright dispute (IP Osgoode) United States US Patent Reform The time for global harmonisation is now: so says David Kappos, Director of the USPTO (IPKat) Kappos seeks to fight patent reform opposition with facts (IAM) Why the Americans should leave Europe out of their first-to-invent debate – UPDATED (IAM) House debates patent reform – H. [read post]