Search for: "United States v. Holyfield"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2014, 6:24 am
In Holyfield-Vega v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Holyfield[48] and overturned its decision, from Claymore v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:45 am
Itasca County defeats (19) United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:01 am
Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30, 109 S. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:16 am
Part 3 of my paper on the existing Indian family exception to ICWA.Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Holyfield[48] and overturned its decision, from Claymore v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:44 am
Arizona State Tax Commission (411US164) — No state tax on reservation income v. (22) United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[27] The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 12:07 pm
See Brackeen v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:16 am
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 am
Finally, Justice Scalia wrote the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:00 am
These regulations will provide a stronger measure of consistency in the implementation of ICWA and prevent the application of different minimum standards across the United States, contrary to Congress’ intent. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 5:50 am
Last term, the most critical tribal court jurisdiction appeal to hit the Supreme Court of the United States in decades was affirmed by a 4-4 tie in favor of tribal jurisdiction. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:07 pm
In at least one United States Supreme Court case, Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:15 am
These regulations will provide a stronger measure of consistency in the implementation of ICWA and prevent the application of different minimum standards across the United States, contrary to Congress’ intent. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[27] The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:24 am
The United States Marshals Service fugitive task force and the local sheriff’s office deputies went to Ross’ mansion to take him into custody on a felony warrant. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Holyfield, 490 U.S. at 36, 109 S.Ct. 1597; see Pitre v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Application of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine prior to Holyfield Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Application of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine prior to Holyfield Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
