Search for: "United States v. Hood"
Results 121 - 140
of 321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 11:27 am
The North Carolina Court of Appeals decided a significant case yesterday, ruling in State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:05 pm
In 2009, a jihadist attacked the Fort Hood military base in Texas. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 7:00 am
United States (1913), and United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 2:45 pm
United States that the statute applied to any act “designed to defraud by representations as to the past or present, or suggestions and promises as to the future. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 12:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:48 pm
Anthony Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, argued for the United States as amicus in support of U.S. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:03 am
United States, et al. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:05 pm
United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000). [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:26 pm
Hood has asked the United States Supreme Court to hear his case. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
It is, therefore, of great consequence and concern that the California court summarily decided that the order made against Google could not be enforced in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:59 am
Of course by 1942, the war was on and the government's power to dictate production had more urgency.The sick chicken and wheat cases are just the first two on a long list of interstate commerce cases involving food, and sometimes food safety.Baldwin, Hood, and Dean are among the names of three early cases involving milk and state laws to discriminate against out-of-state products.The result of the Baldwin case was basically that if a state is going to isolate… [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
Barnes v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:54 am
Last week, I saw a Tweet about the United States Supreme Court granting certiorari in a construction dispute ... and I thought it had to be an April Fools' Day joke because they never take construction cases on appeal. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:49 am
A recent case that alleged harm under the Federal Tort Claims Act, DUCKWALL-KENNADY v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:23 am
The District Court, however, ruled that an earlier decision from the Fourth Circuit, United States v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:34 am
” For this claim, Jawad relied on United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
United States Steel Corp., which clarified what it means for an employee to be “changing clothes” under Section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:10 am
Citing Google v. [read post]
