Search for: "United States v. Hopp" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
Hoppe observes an abrasive attitude by the United States Supreme Court in its recent Sanchez-Llamas v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:58 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Pool Case number: 13-cv-00096 (United States District for the District of Utah) Case filed: July 2, 2013 Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 18, 2014 05/22/2014 08/20/2014 2014-51 SEC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 6:43 am by Florian Mueller
That makes sense.At the same time, Pfizer and BioNTech have made a strategically very smart move, too:With its narrative that portrays CureVac as a sore loser (without using that term), the complaint is directed not only at the court of law (and the jury to be selected further down the road) but also at the court of public opinion.Pfizer is headquartered in New York but has a home-field advantage anywhere in the United States, and BioNTech has one of its two U.S. offices in the Bay… [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Marie Louise
(IAM)   United Kingdom EWHC (Admin) holds defendant’s acquisition of illegally copied audio files would constitute an offence under s. 329 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002: Sitek v Circuit Court of Swidnica (1709 Copyright Blog) IPO – Original Bucks Fizz members lose trade mark battle over name (Out-Law) (IPKat) Should the UK facilitate online filing of registered design applications? [read post]