Search for: "United States v. Hoyt"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2011, 10:35 am
The district court agreed with Maersk, holding that since the contract was negotiated and executed outside the United States, it was not an offer to sell within the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:59 am
For example, on April 11, 2011, Judge Hoyt from the Houston Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled that Texas law is on the carrier’s side when it comes to examinations under oath. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:40 am
In fact, Cardone said, the church would have run afoul of the law only if it engaged in activities that amounted to making a contribution to a political campaign.Cardone also noted in her Hoyt v. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 4:57 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:40 pm
, and others filed suit against DOL in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Alexandria Division. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm
Oklahoma; Self Defense) United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:09 pm
Co., 1 AD3d at 471; see also Hayner Hoyt Corp. v Utica First Ins. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 10:36 am
The case of Sisson v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 2:05 pm
Supreme Court's 1984 decision in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:39 am
Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case which decided that benefits given by the United States military to the family of service members cannot be given out differently because of sex.Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated at oral argument:"Mr. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:50 am
Hoyt, a Judge in the United States District Court, S. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 10:28 am
A217A Pheffer (MS) -- Establishes the identity theft prevention and mitigation unit
No Same as
BLURB : Exec. identy theft prev mitgn unt
Last Act: 04/09/07 amend and recommit to consumer affairs and protection
04/09/07 print number 217a
A7280 Finch (MS) -- Authorizes uniformed marine patrol officers in Cayuga county to carry firearms
Same as S 3119
BLURB : CP L. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
He continued to claim that he was arguing with his girlfriend before he saw the officers, and stated that she was also the person he had called from the booking area. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 1:39 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am
Div. 1982); Hoyt v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:47 am
Hoyt presiding. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 11:33 pm
("MERS"), Defendants.Civil Action H-17-239.United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 8:51 am
(See, e.g., Kaiser Aetna v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am
In the 1961 case Hoyt v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 11:31 am
United States, 51 U.S. 109, 135 (1850) (describing an emolument as "every species of compensation or pecuniary profit derived from a discharge of the duties of the office"); see also James C. [read post]
