Search for: "United States v. Huff" Results 1 - 20 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2012, 9:01 pm by Kali Borkoski
The Court announced three opinions in argued cases, including United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:46 am
As Wikipedia notes, “Title III of the Act set rules for obtaining wiretap orders in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm by Patricia Salkin
This is an appeal from an amended opinion and order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, dismissing at the pleadings stage all federal claims against the defendants on qualified immunity grounds because the plaintiffs had not adequately alleged that their constitutional rights were violated, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 10:08 pm
First, only the United States is now permitted to sue for penalties under the false marking statue. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:02 am
Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:26 am by Kali Borkoski
United States, and Ryburn v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
Both Huff and Deason placed orders to the vendors that they knew would not be filled and paid for the orders using government credit cards. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
Both Huff and Deason placed orders to the vendors that they knew would not be filled and paid for the orders using government credit cards. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am by Conor McEvily
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]