Search for: "United States v. INTERNATIONAL L. AND W. UNION" Results 1 - 20 of 200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:26 am by Jon Hyman
When a judicial opinion starts out with a quote such as this, it’s usually not a good sign for the defendant, unless you happen to be the United Auto Workers, the defendant in Phillips v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:06 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, summary judgment was granted in favor of the union (International Association of Machinists, District 10 and Local Lodge 873 v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 8:14 am
Aznar, Exporting Environmental Standards to Protect Underwater Cultural Heritage in the Area Ida Caracciolo, Migration and the Law of the Sea: Solutions and Limitations of a Fragmentary Regime Rafael Casado Raigón, La dimension internationale de la compétence de lUnion européenne en matière de pêche Emmanuel Dupont & Alexia Solomou, Provisional Measures in Maritime Delimitation Cases Pierre- Víctor L. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
Taken by itself and out of context, the question "Is it acceptable that the European Union abandons its powers in favour of the Member States? [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Stakeholder reaction to emissions trading in the United States, the European Union, and the Netherlands. 25 J. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
European Models from the 1980s were driven both by the principles of free movement basic to the European Union Treaties within the context of de-socialization from the 1980s.[21] The contemporary approaches of European states represent a long dialogue (sometimes quite strident) between markets driven states and the brand of markets-rejecting European Marxist Leninism that characterized the old Soviet Empire and its satellites in Europe. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]