Search for: "United States v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, ETC." Results 1 - 20 of 197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2013, 3:18 am by Matt Danzer
Finally, Judge Newman questions the following sentences from page 47 of the government’s appellate brief: Given recent acknowledgments by the President and other senior officials of the previously properly classified fact that the United States carried out the targeted strike that killed Anwar al-Awlaki, DOJ has now determined that it can provide some limited additional information about classified documents in its possession that are responsive to the ACLU request. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:59 am by Public Employment Law Press
Maanen v New York Univ. 2022 NY Slip Op 03575 Decided on June 02, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:59 am by Public Employment Law Press
Maanen v New York Univ. 2022 NY Slip Op 03575 Decided on June 02, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:59 am by Public Employment Law Press
Maanen v New York Univ. 2022 NY Slip Op 03575 Decided on June 02, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:59 am by Public Employment Law Press
Maanen v New York Univ. 2022 NY Slip Op 03575 Decided on June 02, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
According to Horlick, some of the earlier cases addressed claims of State-aid, especially international aid, for example, loans from international organizations, Marshall Plan aid to European countries, West German subsidies to West Berlin, etc. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:04 am
D V Sadananda Gowda (Union Minister of Law) will inaugurate the seminar and Mr. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Lastly, we have come to understand that the enormity of national political power may itself be constrained, though to what extent is still unresolved, by the higher powers of international law and custom, expressed either as the consensus of states (through treaties and conventions) or through the customary expectations of the international community (jus cogens--slavery, protection of ambassadors, etc.). [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
  The United States, as incarnated in its Chief Executive and as articulated in his State of the Union, suggests this process of aging. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am by ASAD KHAN
More significantly, member states would risk breaching of their obligations under the international instruments cited. [read post]