Search for: "United States v. Illinois Terminal R. Co." Results 21 - 40 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
After he was terminated, an assistant attorney general filed a lawsuit alleging, among other claims, a Sec. 1983 equal protection claim against the Illinois attorney general and several of her staff individually, asserting that he had been fired due to age discrimination. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:37 pm by Robert Milligan
 Marshfield also filed a complaint against Stuart in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, seeking an order from the court for arbitration as well an injunction barring Stuart from working at TruStile Doors. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
(IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Accused infringer need not test prior art patented products to prove invalidity: Viskase Cos., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 10:36 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
House of Brides subsequently brought an action in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, for violations of the Sherman Act, and state antitrust and unfair competition laws. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United States—flew under the radar perhaps because it was decided narrowly; the Court upheld the discretion enjoyed by the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
There have been three landmark cases issued by the Supreme Court during the last generation or two concerning the extent to which the presidency and the executive branch should be immune from legal and judicial processes and orders that would require disclosure of executive information and/or consumption of executive time: the famous Nixon Tapes case, United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am by Marie Louise
Manufacturing LLC (TTABlog) District Court N D Illinois: Letter sent outside Illinois cannot create Jurisdiction: Alta Mere Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
Casey,a state can regulate abortion before viability as long as it does not impose an undue burden on a woman’s right to terminate a pregnancy. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm by Marie Louise
(Article One Partners) Patenting green technology: What you need to know (IPEG) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in case concerning laser inscribing of diamonds a mixed bag: Lazare Kaplan v PhotoScribe (IPBiz) CAFC sides with USPTO in patent re-examination declaration dispute: In re Meyer Manufacturing (Patents Post-Grant) District Court N D Illinois: Scrivener’s error in patent marking does not preclude finding of intent to deceive: Lundeen et al v John T… [read post]