Search for: "United States v. International Business MacHines" Results 1 - 20 of 343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A dissenting judge argued that one of the patents contained plausibly valid claims that recited technical improvements to a graphical user interface (International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Comparative International Law: Canadian courts often welcome a comparative analysis of the laws of its neighbors – especially the laws of the United Kingdom and United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:07 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York was recently asked to enforce a non-competition agreement between International Business Machines, Corp. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 11:00 am
United States, 490 U.S. 858, 864 (1989) (describing "settled policy to avoid an interpretation of a federal statute that engenders constitutional issues if a reasonable alternative interpretation poses no constitutional question"); Ashwander v. [read post]
Ultimately, a comprehensive online voting regime in the United States is not off the table in perpetuity. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:24 pm by brandond
On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court of the United States released a long-awaited opinion regarding the patentability of business method patents. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
International Business Machines CorporationCase number: 11-cv-00563 (United States District for the District of Columbia)Case filed: March 18, 2011Qualifying judgment/order: July 25, 2013 8/16/2013 11/14/2013 2013-67 In the Matter of ABN AMRO Bank, N.V.Administrative Proceeding File No.: 3-15401Case filed: July 31, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: July 31, 2013 8/16/2013 11/14/2013 … [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:46 pm by Victoria VanBuren
[This is the first installment in a three-part series on the Guest-Post:  States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration:  AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:28 am by Gene Quinn
The Applicants then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Zoanne Zeininger, the state's highest court held that certification tests of Breathalyzer Machines are admissible in evidence as business records, and are not testimonial statements triggering the 6th Amendment Right of Confrontation. [read post]
2 May 2024, 10:39 am
Section 2333(a) provides thatAny national of the United States injured in his or her person, property, or business by reason of an act of international terrorism, or his or her estate, survivors, or heirs, may sue therefor in any appropriate district court of the United States and shall recover threefold the damages he or she sustains and the cost of the suit, including attorney’s fees. (8 USC §2333(a)).Pix credit hereSection… [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 8:25 am by David J. Clark
A recent decision of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, entitled International Business Machines Corporation v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:02 am by Larry
Penalty cases are abundant these days.In United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:06 am by Andy Zahn - Guest
McIntyre does business in the United States through a single distributor, meaning that the British company could have expected the products to end up anywhere in the United States, including New Jersey. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The title of the article is The Quiet Coup, and it's introductory paragraph changed my whole year… The crash has laid bare many unpleasant truths about the United States. [read post]