Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission" Results 181 - 200 of 331
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2017, 8:17 am by Robert M. Horwitz and Kyle M. Asher
On June 12, 2017, the United States Supreme Court held that a buyer of defaulted consumer debt was not subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm by Jarod Bona
Toys “R” Us sold about twenty-percent of the toys in the United States and in some metropolitan areas, it sold up to almost half of the toys. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm by Jarod Bona
Toys “R” Us sold about twenty-percent of the toys in the United States and in some metropolitan areas, it sold up to almost half of the toys. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
District Court for the Southern District of Florida indicted Rutgerson with one count of:`using any facility and means of interstate commerce, [to] knowingly attempt to persuade, induce, entice, and coerce an individual who had not attained the age of eighteen years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a criminal offense, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b). [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am by John Elwood
Garza, 17-654 Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
In Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 6:44 am
Supreme court case of Caulder -v- Bull 3 U.S. 386 (1798) which states:"I will state what laws I consider ex post facto laws, within the words and the intent of the prohibition. 1st. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:38 am by Charlotte Garden
… The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State and any agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State, and any interstate agency, but such term does not include the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:45 pm by Lyle Denniston
If anything, the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The Chief Justice stated that “[s]elling produce in interstate commerce, although certainly subject to reasonable governmental regulation, is not a special governmental benefit that the Government may hold hostage, to be ransomed by the waiver of constitutional protection”. [read post]
11 May 2022, 7:19 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-5967Issue: Whether Zenon Grzegorczyk is entitled to relief on his claim that knowingly using a facility of interstate commerce with intent that a murder be committed, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]