Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission"
Results 81 - 100
of 329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
Brief of the United States (Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission), in support of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Rasier, LLC, v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:36 pm
Int'l v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
The committee will hear testimony from Christopher Krebs, the director of the cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency at DHS; Diane Rinaldo, the acting assistant secretary of commerce for the national telecommunications and information administration; Robert Strayer, the deputy assistant secretary of state for cyber and international communications and information policy; Jessica Rosenworcel, a commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
If Bitqyck used “any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce for the purpose of using a facility of an exchange within or subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to effect one or more transactions in a security,” it could be held liable for hosting an unregistered exchange. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 1:20 am
United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:26 am
The United States Supreme Court recently issued its decision in a case that, on the surface, appears to impact the wine and liquor industry. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 3:12 pm
Penalty Provisions of Federal Gun Law Struck Down In the opening line of a June 24, 2019 ruling in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm
The chief justice says that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
Under the dormant Commerce Clause, states cannot engage in economic protectionism or “unjustifiably… discriminate against or burden the interstate flow of articles of commerce. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 2:54 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:43 am
Fontenot v. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 4:02 pm
Finally, the Court held that the shackling of Ayala during her non-jury sentencing was not an abuse of discretion.United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
Lastly, United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm
United States, 674 F.3d 509, 532-33 (6th Cir. 2012). [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Dept. of Commerce, Case 1:18-cv-02921 (SDNY, Filed 15 January 2019).* * * C. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
They may, however, violate the Dormant Commerce Clause, which generally prevents States from “discriminat[ing] against interstate commerce” or “favor[ing] in-state economic interests over out-of- state interests,” if they fail to similarly address out-of-state and domestic products. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:21 am
He has also said the court should scrap the dormant commerce clause, the doctrine that says that because Congress regulates interstate commerce, states can’t interfere with such commerce. [read post]
