Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission" Results 121 - 140 of 329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2010, 7:47 am by Josh Wright
”  Recall the Supreme Court’s decision in Granholm v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The move was rejected by the NZ Commerce Commission. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 2:32 pm by Holland & Hart
Gutierrez The Supreme Court of the United States will begin its upcoming session on Monday, October 1, 2018. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am by Christa Culver
California Coastal Commission, which by definition implicate no compensation issues, fall outside the purview of the state-procedures rule outlined in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:59 pm by James Romoser
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will delve into that question in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:59 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
Sessions III issued a decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 4:54 am by Susan Brenner
  (As this site explains, the requirement that the material involved in the commission of the offense have traveled in interstate commerce is essential in establishing that federal courts have jurisdiction to hear the case.) [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm by Christa Culver
United States (1977) recognizes a distinct Commerce Clause authority, beyond the three categories recognized in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 5:30 pm by Aimee Brown
The second case this week is United Power, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:10 pm by Christa Culver
United States (1977) recognizes a distinct Commerce Clause authority, beyond the three categories recognized in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 7:56 am by Susan Brenner
Code makes it a federal crime, essentially, to use interstate commerce in “the commission of murder-for hire. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by NCC Staff
The empowerment of the Interstate Commerce Commission (or ICC) a decade earlier to control shipping rates came about with passage of the Hepburn Rate Act of 1906. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am by Matthew Forys
The RLA granted collective-bargaining rights to railroad workers to prevent disruption of interstate commerce caused by labor disputes. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 11:16 am
The attendance of witnesses and the production of documentary evidence may be required from any place in the United States, or any territory, possession, or commonwealth of the United States, at any designated place of hearing [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:21 am by Stephen Wermiel
He has also said the court should scrap the dormant commerce clause, the doctrine that says that because Congress regulates interstate commerce, states can’t interfere with such commerce. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:42 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
BNSF Railway has denied these claims, and also argues that the CWA, in this instance, is preempted by the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act, 49 U.S.C. [read post]