Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission et al" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am by Christa Culver
California Pharmacists AssociationDocket: 09-1158Issue(s): (1) Whether Medicaid recipients and providers may maintain a cause of action under the Supremacy Clause to enforce § 1396a(a)(30)(A) by asserting that the provision preempts a state law reducing reimbursement rates; and (2) whether a state law reducing Medicaid reimbursement to providers may be held preempted by § 1396a(a)(30)(A) based on requirements that do not appear in the text of the statute.Certiorari-Stage… [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
United StatesDocket: 10-516Issue(s): Whether an essential element to be proven for a conviction for the offense of bribery of a state or local official under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christa Culver
Brown (1943); and (2) whether a binding agreement among multiple states, with both intra- and interstate effects, violates the Compact Clause, Article I, § 10, cl. 3 of the United States Constitution, in the absence of congressional approval.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Freedom Holdings et al.Reply brief for the petitioners Title: Lay v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:14 pm by Christa Culver
Title: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 6:04 pm by Francis Pileggi
On September 11, 2017, the United States Department of Justice filed a Criminal Information against Pharmacy and its parent, charging that the repackaging program illegally introduced misbranded drugs into interstate commerce under the Food and Drug Commission Act under 21 U.S.C. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Nothing in this Act shall apply to any of the following:(1) Actions or transactions specifically authorized by laws administered by any regulatory body or officer acting under statutory authority of this State or the United States.815 Ill. [read post]
BP PLC et al., further separating climate litigation cases from the federal court system by holding that the nuisance claims in climate litigation shall be heard in state courts and not federal. [read post]