Search for: "United States v. Issa"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2016, 11:53 am
On June 10, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:45 am
State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:06 pm
The federal district court’s decision last week (Issa v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:01 am
State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:48 am
In the present case, United States Electronics, Inc. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 11:12 am
”) State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am
Issa and Sen. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 4:55 am
After several weeks, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 3:56 am
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights in a recent landmark decision, Lohé Issa Konaté v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
Supreme Court's decision in Golan v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Among them are Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
House of Representativesin response to the United States International Trade Commission's mid-December notice relating to the ITC's investigation of Qualcomm's first complaint against Apple (with Qualcomm seeking an import ban, which is the ITC's sole remedy).The United States Senators and United States Representatives who filed those letters, which support Administrative Law Judge Thomas B. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
Expressing frustration at two examples - Apple v Kodak and Broadcom v Qualcomm. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:43 am
This morning the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down its long-awaited judgment in Al Skeini & Others v United Kingdom, and its partner case of Al Jedda v United Kingdom, concerning whether the United Kingdom had any liability under the Convention for the alleged deaths and detention of individuals in SE Iraq during its military campaign there. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Prior to the ruling, federal courts were able to prosecute individuals as young as 15 for material support, but in the wake of the Sessions v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution entitled same-sex couples to equal treatment with married heterosexual couples under federal law in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:45 pm
” Recently, AALL promoted Malamud’s petition for an amendment to the Copyright Act that would make clear that edicts of government have no copyright in the United States. [read post]
