Search for: "United States v. Jacobsen"
Results 101 - 120
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2013, 10:17 pm
First, in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Supp. 2d 479, 484 (E.D.N.Y. 2012) (“the federal duty of ‘sameness’’’ also applies in the context of generic drug design, and federal law preempts state laws imposing a duty to change a drug’s design on generic drug manufacturers”); Jacobsen v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 10:25 am
Last year, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (”CAFC”) overturned the District Court decision in Jacobsen v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:31 am
The government seizes property when it meaningfully interferes with the possessory interest in that property, a test offered in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 5:49 am
The IPKat is really disappointed that this action is being brought in the United States and not in Europe following last month's Intel v CPM ruling (see IPKat here and here), where counsel on both sides could indulge in endless argument as to the state of mind of the relevant consumer, the likelihood of confusion and the extent to which the use of the mark on the t-shirt might be expected to affect the economic activity of consumers of the claimant's… [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 4:58 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 5:58 am
The prosecution underlying United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Walton, Judge, The United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaClosing remarks4:15-4:30 p.m. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:56 am
The seminal case in this area is United States v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:19 pm
This morning, the Sixth Circuit handed down a new case, United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:29 pm
Jacobsen, 2007 U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:29 pm
Jacobsen, 2007 U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:29 am
Jacobsen, 2007 U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
De Niz Robles v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 4:00 am
(IP Whiteboard) FrangranceNet - Keyword ad and product shots case survives motion to dismiss - FragranceNet v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 4:36 am
., United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:42 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:52 am
This debate has been more prevalent in the United States, and to a lesser extent in other Common Law jurisdictions such as England and Wales. [read post]
