Search for: "United States v. James Miller"
Results 81 - 100
of 312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2014, 11:14 am
And that was the end of it for Miller. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:51 am
A Spanish court will hear whether he can be extradited to the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-8997, United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
United States, 17-6140, James v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
James v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 43. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
” At Summary Judgments, Eric Miller discusses the Court’s recent decision in Utah v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
Kornreich, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Ret); Of Counsel, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer and Nelson, P.A. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Officer Levi Miller investigated the case. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:09 pm
" James v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
See Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
For those of you interested in hearing from eminent domain experts across the United States on hot topic condemnation issues, I hope you’ll join us at the ALI-CLE’s 32nd Annual Eminent domain and Land Valuation Litigation Program. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-6140, James v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
See State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
(United States v. [read post]
