Search for: "United States v. James Patterson" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2009, 10:58 am
By James Pugh & Dave Lanferman On October 22, 2009, the California Supreme Court decided not to review the Court of Appeal's decision in the landmark Palmer/Sixth Street Properties v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 1:14 pm
Patterson* [PDF Version] Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 5:49 pm by Greensboro Legal Blog
In its first decade, the law firm did more to influence evolving federal civil rights law than any other private law practice in the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 6:50 pm
United States (1883); Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 5:16 am by Anushka Limaye
Craig Forcese discussed Huawei Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou’s legal battle in Canada over extradition to the United States, and Quinta Jurecic shared Huawei’s lawsuit against the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
Hammond in turn instructed Curaden USA employee Magen James to send the advertisement to the purchased target list of over 46,000 fax numbers. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm by Amy Howe
The justices asked the federal government for its views on Patterson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
The court denied review in the serially rescheduled and relisted Patterson v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
” From the Introduction:  On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
"The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that police officers are public officials. [read post]