Search for: "United States v. Jim" Results 81 - 100 of 1,277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2022, 8:30 am by Dale Carpenter
[What the Supreme Court should do in 303 Creative v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In her final law-school paper, Murray formalized that idea, arguing that segregation violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
By Nina Rice* The history of New York’s statutory law pertaining to the art market is relatively brief despite the state’s long held status as the art capital of the United States, if not the world. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
New York: [The Constitution] is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar, or novel, and even shocking, ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States…. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Women in the school and the state succeeded in getting a federal court to invalidate the Connecticut abortion law in Abele v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It is the latter because the Supreme Court, weeks before the publication of Jim Fleming’s Constructing Basic Liberties, made mincemeat of fundamental rights doctrine (and of stare decisis) in Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am by David Kopel
In August, The Trace presented a conspiracy about the amicus briefs filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 4:29 am by jonathanturley
President Biden has denounced pre-2020 and post-2020 changes to the state election laws as not just “Jim Crow on steroids” but “Jim Eagle,” an awkward effort to suggest something more scary than Jim Crow. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm by William Appleton
United States which held that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program conflicted with limits on executive authority in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). [read post]