Search for: "United States v. Job"
Results 141 - 160
of 8,266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2007, 1:00 pm
The Supreme Court Holds That The Plaintiff Has the Burden of Proof of Qualification for Job Green v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 12:06 pm
” Just this month in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 6:50 am
Supreme Court will hear the following case today: Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 11:07 am
Colvin, No, August 2, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit More Blog Entries: Worker Taxed Thousands for Social Security Disability Benefits He Never Received, June 21, 2016, Boston SSDI Lawyer Blog The post Taylor v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:27 am
Shortly before her assignment was to expire, Respondent informed Petitioner that she intended to file for divorce, seek a new job, and relocate their children to the United States. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:09 am
See Valenzuela v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
Contracting out a negotiating unit's work Vestal Employees Asso., NEA/NY v Vestal CSD, 94 N.Y.2d 409 Management may attempt to “contract out” work claiming that to do so is more efficient or less expensive or because the tasks are “too technical” for its employees to perform. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:03 pm
United States District Court Judge Ronald M. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 10:57 am
Departure from Federal Procedure The United States Supreme Court ruled on June 23 in Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:28 am
Colvin, February 9, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 6:50 am
Carolyn Colvin, No. 14-3163 (7th Cir. 2015), July 31, 2015, United States Court of Appeal for the Seventh Circuit More Blog Entries: Hanson v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 4:29 pm
On June 18, 2012, the United States Supreme Court in Christopher v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
Disqualifying applicants for a particular job EEOC v Woodbridge Corp., CA8, 263 F.3d 812Mathews v The Denver Post, CA10, 2001 WL 967797 The Woodbridge and Mathews cases concern similar issues: disqualifying an individual with a disability for a particular job or assignment. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:27 am
Dist. v Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 40 NY2d 268, the Court of Appeals explained that “Not all job security clauses are valid and enforceable, nor are they ‘valid and enforceable under all circumstances’" In Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, the court ruled that a "job security" clause that stated that "During the life of this contract no person in this bargaining unit shall be terminated due to budgetary reasons or abolition… [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am
The editors did a wonderful job putting together a great list of speakers. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:15 am
Because if your company start getting letters from the United States and your HR Director "literally stuff[s] the government’s correspondence in a drawer and never respond[s]," you may find yourself on the wrong end of a $300,000+ penalty.Which is generally not good for your company. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 7:07 am
In Huber v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 5:46 am
In Shirley Lacko v. [read post]
