Search for: "United States v. Juvenile Male" Results 1 - 20 of 87
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Ghanaian man comes to the United States on an F-1 visa, which allows him to stay in the country as long as he's enrolled in an approved educational institution. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:01 am by Roelke Law, P.A.
State, 28 So. 3d 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), a hotel clerk reported a black male—who was with three other black males in a maroon four-door vehicle—was trying to open the back door of the hotel around 4 a.m. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Petitioner Bostock worked for the Clayton County Juvenile Court System as a child welfare services coordinator. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Upon his return to the Riverhead facility, Francis's paperwork was "re-written" from being an "adult male misdemeanor" case to be being an "adult male warrant" case based on the ICE warrant, and Francis was regarded by the Sheriff as being in the custody of ICE. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm by Ron Miller
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5684; farewell Gates v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 8:55 pm by Jon Katz
Fortunately, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has this month confirmed that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution bars ordering a male criminal suspect to produce an erection. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 738 F.3d 885, 892 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 738 F.3d 885, 892 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am by Kevin Russell
The majority believed that although the manager treated many employees (male and female) poorly, even the badly treated male employees “testified Strickland was treated differently from every male employee [the manager] supervised. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
A male employee’s Title VII claim that he was subjected to a hostile work environment by his male supervisor and coworkers—including being asked if he wore makeup, nicknamed Mary Kay, presented with a dress during a work meeting, and jokingly called a transvestite—was tossed on summary judgment since there was no evidence that he failed to adhere to gender stereotypes, the alleged harassers targeted many males, and the comments were better understood as… [read post]