Search for: "United States v. Ka" Results 61 - 80 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2022, 12:25 pm by William Appleton
Václav Bartuška, the Czech ambassador-at-large for Energy Security.. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Notwithstanding potential opposition to the plan in the House of Lords, abolition of Section 40 could spell the formal end of the state-backed press regulation system envisaged by the Leveson report. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 5:08 pm
Food-related illness and death in the United States. [read post]
21 May 2021, 6:28 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Blumm and Lizzy PennockLewis & Clark Law School and Lewis & Clark College – Lewis and Clark Law School PERMANENT HOMELANDS THROUGH TREATIES WITH THE UNITED STATES: RESTORING FAITH IN THE TRIBAL NATION-U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States CNN reports that a settlement has been reached in a defamation case against Bill Cosby — but representatives for the comedian say he didn’t cut the deal. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
United States TikTok and ByteDance have initiated legal action against the US government, challenging a recently enacted law that would ban TikTok unless ByteDance sells the company off in the next nine months to an entity not controlled by a foreign adversary. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm by Kelly
Now we know, it’s a myth (IPKat) United States US General Are you small, American, IP-ish and in business? [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The News Media Association (NMA) and National Union of Journalists issued statements stating that the changes would “weaken the flow of information from police forces to the general public, undermining the public right to know. [read post]