Search for: "United States v. Kaufman"
Results 81 - 100
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2012, 1:41 pm
The laws surrounding horse slaughter in the United States are complicated, and they vary from state to state. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:46 am
By Thomas Kaufman and Tina Rad Employers breathed a sigh of relief when the California Supreme Court issued its December 29, 2011 ruling reversing the Court of Appeal's decision in Harris v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:01 am
By Thomas Kaufman (follow me on Twitter) On June 4, 2012, the California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Two, issued Iskanian v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:13 am
Kaufman at the Harvard Crimson. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:22 am
This is separate from the issue pending before the United States Supreme Court in Christopher v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:35 pm
By Thomas Kaufman (follow me on Twitter) As anticipated, today the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am
United States, by a vote of six to three, the Court held that a federal district court has the discretion to order a federal criminal sentence to run after a state criminal sentence that is anticipated but has not yet been imposed. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 10:00 pm
By Thomas Kaufman (follow me on Twitter) Duran v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:20 am
By Thomas Kaufman and Travis Anderson On December 13, 2011, the Ninth Circuit issued its most recent decision in the Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:59 am
Any extra burglary conviction violated the double jeopardy clause of the Colorado and United States Constitutions. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:58 am
Any extra burglary conviction violated the double jeopardy clause of the Colorado and United States Constitutions. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:11 am
Kaufman, 307 A.D.2d at 125; Brasseur v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:33 pm
Key v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 7:16 am
Review Board, 450 U.S. 707, 713 (1981); United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:07 pm
Review Board, 450 U.S. 707, 713 (1981); United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 11:24 am
Last week, the Ninth Circuit issued a decision in Solis v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
In other words, only the State or Council 82 could sue the other for any alleged breach of the contract.* Finally the Appellate Division ruled that LeBlanc's reliance on a claim that the officers are third-party beneficiaries of the contract between the State and Council 82 “is equally misplaced,” citing Lundgren v Kaufman Astoria Studios, 261 AD2d 513. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:58 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
