Search for: "United States v. Kenyon"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2009, 2:04 am
In aggravated sexual abuse of a child trial, trial court was not required to hold a Daubert reliability hearing before admitting expert testimony by a university professor of pediatrics concerning the characteristics of minor victims of abuse; trial court has discretion to decide whether a Daubert hearing is required, in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 3:39 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:52 am
. -- Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of TexasOpinion Date: 12/13/11Cite: Kenyon Int'l Emergency Svcs., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
Facts: This case (Raab v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
Michael Lennon (Partner, Kenyon) then took over. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 1:35 am
Compare United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
” Waltersheid, The Early Evolution of the United States Patent Law: Antecedents (Part 3), 77 J. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 7:51 am
Tamara Wittes argued that the United States cannot save Egypt from itself. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:37 am
In trial involving aggravated sexual abuse of a child, the victim’s statements to a physician’s assistant made “three years after the first alleged instance of abuse, and roughly a week after the most recent abuse” were not admissible as excited utterances under FRE 803(2), in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:53 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 3:56 am
by Dennis Crouch Helsinn v. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
In a note published in the New York University Law Review, Kenyon critiques Alt v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
(collectively Lilly), filed suit against all defendants for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,229,382 ('382 patent). [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
(in support of petitioner) Amicus brief of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation (in support of petitioner) Amicus brief of the United States (in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-77 Case name: Riley v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:26 pm
Judge O’Malley wrote an interesting dissent while sitting by designation in Ormco Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Class 46) Trading Standards officers uses new inspection powers granted under Copyright, Designs and Patent Act (Out-Law) United States US General IP legislation to watch in 2009 (Law360) IP cases to follow in 2009 (Law360) US Trade Representative issues statement on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ContentAgenda) Does the Federal Circuit need a fresh viewpoint? [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
He described the circuit split leading to FTC v Actavis currently pending in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:44 pm
§ 112, is granted “the right to exclude others from making, using, or selling the invention throughout the United States,” for a period of 17 years. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 4:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
