Search for: "United States v. Knowles" Results 141 - 160 of 275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Ben Stokes v The Sun: gross intrusion or simple reportage? [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge dismissed the $250 million defamation lawsuit filed by high school student Nicholas Sandmann against The Washington Post. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Google is expected to pay a multimillion dollar penalty from the Federal Trade Commission over its handling of kids’ information on its popular video site YouTube. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
United States The Federal Trade Commission voted to approve a fine of roughly [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
United States The Judge has reduced the damages in the Oberlin college libel case from $44m to $25m to comply with various limits laid down in Ohio law. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday 27 June 2019 Julian Knowles J handed judgment in the case of Bull v Desporte (heard 25 to 28 March 2019). [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
United States The father of a victim of the massacre at Sandy Hook, has won a defamation suit against the authors of a book called Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, purporting a series of false claims. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby j heard applications in Advertising Standards Authority v Mitchell and in Stunt v Associated Newspapers and the case of Morgan v Times Newspapers was mentioned before Soole J. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
United States A jury has awarded bakery owner David Gibson damages of $11 million against Oberlin College which had accused Gibsons Bakery of having a history of racial profiling and discriminatory treatment. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 7:23 pm by Steve Brachmann
Knowles spoke in the second panel of today's hearing and said she hopes the proposed bill would in fact overturn the Myriad decision because "there's been a dead stop in research in the United States on isolated natural products. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 17 May 2019 Julian Knowles J heard an appeal in the case of Desporte v Bull. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Bull v Desporte, heard 25 to 28 March 2019 (Julian Knowles J) Sadik v Sadik, heard 2 April 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Law Journal reports that a libel claim filed [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am by INFORRM
United States Associated Press reports on a motion filed by Amber Heard to dismiss the libel action brought by her ex husband, Johnny Depp. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 1:15 pm by Sherry Knowles
Athena Diagnostics filed a petition for en banc rehearing of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Athena Diagnostics v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States CNN reports that a settlement has been reached in a defamation case against Bill Cosby — but representatives for the comedian say he didn’t cut the deal. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
The matter is part heard On 25 to 28 March 2019 Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the defamation case of Bull v Desporte. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States Wired suggests that the state of Utah has become a leader in digital privacy with the passing of a new privacy law. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
United States The ABA Journal reports that a Federal Judge has dismissed a libel claim in the case of Folta v New York Times, Case 1:17cv246-MW-GRJ, hold that a University of Florida professor’s emails are public records that trigger the state’s fair reports privilege. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
  In the article, the authors argue the United States Supreme Court has interpreted the patent eligibility statute in an unconstitutional manner by allowing judicial exceptions to patent eligibility beyond those specifically included in the statute. [read post]