Search for: "United States v. Koch" Results 61 - 80 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:54 am by Karen Gullo
This order, which purports to silence expression of an opinion, would never survive scrutiny under the First Amendment in the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by Guest Blogger
  A number of conservative groups, including the American Legislative Exchange Council and Koch Brothers-funded entities, hope to trigger the second, convention method for the first time in the history of the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
Marginal income tax rates in the mid-1980s were 70 percent on so-called unearned income, plus a few more percent tacked on by the states. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:08 am by SHG
All because the Koch Brothers supported the bill, and anything the Koch Brothers support must be evil. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:33 am
Contents include:David Lindsey, Military Strategy, Private Information, and War Isa Camyar & Bahar Ulupinar, War and the Sectoral Distribution of Wealth: Evidence from United States Firms Anup Phayal, Prabin B. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:47 am by Joe Consumer
  Writes Liptak, The case on commercial speech, Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 pm by Law Lady
Representation Agreement [and] Sales Management Agreement” wherein Alasko retained Foodmark to market Alasko’s products in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Plaintiffs alleged that the Amended Zoning Resolution deprived them of their right to free expression protected by article I, § 8 of the New York State Constitution and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]